The Friday Morning Listen: Joe Jackson – The Duke (2012)

Share this:

There are only two kinds of music. Good music and the other kind.

There are several slight variations of this quote, attributed to Richard Strauss, Charles Mingus, Louis Armstrong, and others. I guess I don’t really care who first said it, because the idea is complete bullshit.

Yes, I know, we “critics” are supposed to have some magical powers of evaluation, our superior abilities able to discern the sublime from the sewage. That’s never worked for me. And though this might lead you to believe that this drops me down into the sea of musical moral relativism, the truth is both more complicated and more simple than that.

Recently, one of my SomethingElse! cohorts Kit O’Toole wrote a review of the latest Joe Jackson album The Duke. Her take on Jackson’s Ellington tribute is that it misses far more than it hits. I almost completely disagreed, the one point of overlap being that I do believe it’s a dangerous undertaking to revisit the catalog of such an icon.

Ms. O’Toole felt that Jackson’s sonic palette often drained the life out of Ellington’s compositions. For every “failure” — the Western feel of “Mood Indigo,” the electronic elements (and Iggy Pop just bein’ there) on “It Don’t Mean A Thing,” the rock leanings on “Perdido/Satin Doll” — I hear triumphs. But the fact that I don’t agree is far less interesting than this question: If there are supposedly only two kinds of music, doesn’t that mean that only one of us can be “right”?

One of the most fascinating things about music, and art in general, is that everybody brings something different to the experience. What I hear in this album is Joe Jackson doing what’s he’s always done: soaking in the essence of something and then extending it through his own eclectic past. There are definite traces of his previous work here, including the choppy funk guitar and menacing, stacatto strings on “Caravan,” the swirling, loungey mood of “Isfahan,” and the slow reggae strut that morphs into a sort of French folk music during “The Mooche/Black and Tan Fantasy.”

Unless it’s played very straight, any covers/tribute record can be accused of taking the music where it shouldn’t go, but that kind of move is part of the Joe Jackson playbook. On the Laughter and Lust tour, Jackson and his band delivered an amazing version of Fleetwood Mac classic “Oh Well.” It was chock full of bombast and explosive Latin percussion. It was breathtaking, with Jackson making the song his own without taking anything away from the original.

“Good” or “bad” music? The simple truth is that sometimes you just like something…or not. Where things get interesting is when you begin to investigate the “why” of the matter. Here we have two opinions in direct opposition. Is one right and one wrong? Maybe we’re just asking the wrong question.

[amazon_enhanced asin=”B008BHIDE4″ container=”” container_class=”” price=”All” background_color=”FFFFFF” link_color=”000000″ text_color=”0000FF” /] [amazon_enhanced asin=”B007X4MZSG” container=”” container_class=”” price=”All” background_color=”FFFFFF” link_color=”000000″ text_color=”0000FF” /]

Mark Saleski

Mark Saleski

Mark Saleski is a writer and music obsessive based out of the woods of central New Hampshire. A past contributor to, and Salon, he originated several of our weekly features including the Friday Morning Listen, (Cross the) Heartland, WTF! Wednesday, and Sparks Fly on E Street. Follow him on Twitter: @msaleski. Contact Something Else! at
Mark Saleski
Share this:
  • Fred Phillips

    Perhaps the better variation of two kinds of music is “what I like and what I don’t.”

    I’ve often been frustrated over the years by angry readers of my reviews who think that I believe I’m some be-all, end-all font of musical knowledge and that when I say I don’t like something, in my mind, that means it’s not worthy music. Nothing could be further from the truth. What I write is my opinion, and my opinion alone. I’ve never claimed to be an expert on any more than that.

    There may be writers out there who think they’re the arbiters of good musical taste, but the vast majority that I’ve known are just folks who like to talk about music. And I disagree with most of them just about as often as I agree.

  • Mark Saleski

    this is exactly why i have trouble with things like starred review systems or even worse, reviews with a numeric score (pitchfork: 76.3).

  • Kit O’Toole

    Hey, that’s what this webzine is all about: expressing opinions and demonstrating how music hits us all differently. And yes, I too get annoyed with critics who make grand pronouncements on what is good or bad. So having differing opinions only deepens understanding. Even if you’re wrong. Just kidding! 🙂

  • Mark Saleski

    well that’s kind of the issue right there: that music hits us all differently.

    some writers seem to completely forget that.

    wait…who’s wrong??? 😉